Essay: Why No More 9/11s?

Random — June 3, 2009 at 8:33 pm

Bruce Schneier pointed out a great essay, “Why No More 9/11s?” by Timothy Noah on Slate. It’s long, but worth the read.

The essay is divided into eight parts that discuss the various theories as to why there has not been a major terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11:

I. The Terrorists-Are-Dumb Theory: 9/11 was a lucky shot, being a big-time terrorist is hard. II. The Near-Enemy Theory: It’s easier to attack the closer enemy (Iraq, Afghanistan) than far (US soil). III. The Melting-Pot Theory: The US has been more successful in assimilating Muslims into society. IV. The Burden-Of-Success Theory: It’s hard to do better than 9/11, so don’t. V. The Flypaper Theory: It’s easier to attack Americans in the Middle East than in the US. VI. The He-Kept-Us-Safe Theory: Part of why George Bush will be considered the worst president in United States history. VII. The Electoral-Cycles Theory: (Non-)Correlation of terrorist attacks with US electoral events. VIII. The Time-Space Theory: Applying rational-choice theory to terrorism.

0 Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. | Eric Garrido