Comments on: RSS 2.0 vs. RSS .93 vs. Atom 0.3 … http://ericgar.com/2008/04/05/rss-20-vs-rss-93-vs-atom-03/ Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:00:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: rajsingh.org blog http://ericgar.com/2008/04/05/rss-20-vs-rss-93-vs-atom-03/comment-page-1/#comment-362 rajsingh.org blog Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:17:05 +0000 http://www.ericgar.com/?p=202#comment-362 [...] agree with Tim Bray (via Eric Garrido (via Bill de hÓra)). USB is an awesome standard because it “just works.” Ever [...] [...] agree with Tim Bray (via Eric Garrido (via Bill de hÓra)). USB is an awesome standard because it “just works.” Ever [...]

]]> By: Eric http://ericgar.com/2008/04/05/rss-20-vs-rss-93-vs-atom-03/comment-page-1/#comment-258 Eric Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:42 +0000 http://www.ericgar.com/?p=202#comment-258 Fixed. Thanks! Fixed. Thanks!

]]> By: James Snell http://ericgar.com/2008/04/05/rss-20-vs-rss-93-vs-atom-03/comment-page-1/#comment-255 James Snell Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:05:19 +0000 http://www.ericgar.com/?p=202#comment-255 s/Atom 2.0/Atom 1.0 There is no Atom 2.0 s/Atom 2.0/Atom 1.0

There is no Atom 2.0

]]> By: Eric http://ericgar.com/2008/04/05/rss-20-vs-rss-93-vs-atom-03/comment-page-1/#comment-253 Eric Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:15:19 +0000 http://www.ericgar.com/?p=202#comment-253 haha. I might as well have just copy-and-pasted your post and slapped a new date on it! haha. I might as well have just copy-and-pasted your post and slapped a new date on it!

]]> By: Nick Bradbury http://ericgar.com/2008/04/05/rss-20-vs-rss-93-vs-atom-03/comment-page-1/#comment-252 Nick Bradbury Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:32:53 +0000 http://www.ericgar.com/?p=202#comment-252 Amen. Sadly, I wrote about this nearly two years ago, and things haven't really changed since then: http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2006/05/pick_a_format_a.html Amen. Sadly, I wrote about this nearly two years ago, and things haven’t really changed since then:

http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2006/05/pick_a_format_a.html

]]>